Arizona Online Casinos

The Arizona gambling landscape has expanded significantly in recent years, particularly with the introduction of legal online sports betting. Despite this, Arizona online casinos remain prohibited under state law.

Although Arizona currently prohibits online casinos, the success of legal sports betting demonstrates the state’s capacity to support a healthy online gambling market.

Efforts to legalize online casinos in Arizona face several challenges, including negotiations with tribal stakeholders and public concerns regarding the implications of expanded gambling. Until proponents overcome these hurdles, sweepstakes casinos will remain the closest alternative available to residents.

Sweepstakes Casinos in Arizona

WOW Vegas35 Free Sweepstakes CoinsWOW Vegas Promo Code: None Needed Get Bonus
Casino.Click250,000 GC + 25 Free SCCasino.Click Promo Code: None Needed Get Bonus
Stake.us25 Stake Cash + 250K Gold CoinsStake.us Promo Code: Not Needed Get Bonus

As the demand for Arizona online gambling options continues to grow, sweepstakes casinos have emerged as a legal alternative. These platforms allow players to play casino-style games like slots, table games, and poker without directly wagering real money.

Sweepstakes casinos offer players the chance to win real money prizes, but they operate under a promotional sweepstakes model. The core idea is that sweepstakes casino games are “free-to-play” and avoid the legal definition of gambling, which requires risking something of value.

Typically, sweepstakes casinos allow users to purchase “Gold Coins,” which have no cash value, for entertainment play only.

As a bonus for purchasing Gold Coins, players may also receive free “Sweeps Coins” to use as sweepstakes entries to play casino-style games like slots online for chances to win additional Sweeps Coins redeemable for cash prizes.

Recommended Arizona Sweepstakes Casinos

See the following links for detailed reviews of BettingUSA’s recommended sweepstakes casinos:

  1. WOW Vegas Casino Review
  2. Stake.us Casino Review
  3. Casino.Click Review

The Legality of Sweepstakes Casinos in Arizona

Arizona officials have stated that only certain types of “free-to-play” games are legal and that others may cross into illegal gambling territory.

The Arizona Department of  Gaming (ADG) acknowledges that the term “sweepstakes” is not explicitly defined by Arizona law but has published guidelines outlining how regulators differentiate lawful sweepstakes promotions from illegal gambling.

The most relevant guidelines include:

  • Allow participation for free, with no purchase of any type required
  • Allow free players the ability to participate in the same manner, to the same extent, and with the same odds of winning as players who make a purchase or payment
  • Do not impose onerous requirements on free players (such as mailing forms or only giving them limited entries) to participate
  • Clearly disclose all free entry options that are just as easy as paid options

Sweepstakes casinos failing to comply with these conditions may be classified as illegal online gambling in Arizona.

Arizona Regulators Are Scrutinizing Sweepstakes Casinos

The Arizona Department of Gaming (ADG) has expressed concerns about the proliferation of sweepstakes casinos.

An ADG advisory in early 2025 cautioned residents about potential exposure to fraudulent activities and emphasized the lack of regulatory oversight, resulting in limited consumer protections and difficulty resolving disputes.

The ADG highlighted that many such operations lack oversight, exposing users to fraud, identity theft, and unfair practices.

While sweepstakes casinos remain technically legal, increased scrutiny suggests possible future regulatory or legislative actions targeting non-compliant operators.

The key takeaway for players is that sweepstakes casinos are the only broadly available online casino option legally accessible in Arizona, but there are caveats:

  • Players must choose reputable, well-known sweepstakes casinos
  • Sweepstakes casinos are not regulated in Arizona like traditional casinos
  • Winnings are not guaranteed by the Arizona Department of Gaming

Will Arizona Legalize Online Casinos?

The legalization of Arizona online casinos is plausible but not imminent due to the state’s cautious approach to gambling expansion.

Arizona has shown a willingness to expand residents’ gambling options, as evidenced by the legalization of online sports betting in 2021.

However, legal Arizona online gambling efforts face a steeper path. No significant legislative proposals to legalize online gambling in Arizona have emerged in recent years, and the state’s focus remains on maintaining a productive relationship with tribal gaming operators.

Despite these challenges, there are also compelling arguments for legalization. Massive revenue potential and warming stakeholder sentiment incentivize lawmakers to find solutions.

In summary: The path to regulating Arizona online casinos is complex but navigable. Much will depend on the alignment of key gambling stakeholders. If they can craft a mutually beneficial framework, Arizona could transition from a dark horse to a serious contender for legalization within the next few years.

Factors Favoring Legalization

The most compelling argument for legalizing online gambling in Arizona is the significant tax revenue it could generate for the state and tribes.

As detailed in the market potential section below, the state could gain upwards of a billion dollars (or more) in gross gaming revenue annually, along with a substantial new tax stream, if Arizona gambling sites are legalized and regulated.

These projections strengthen proponents’ arguments that Arizona is missing out by not regulating online gambling.

Currently, residents who wish to gamble online either use offshore casinos or spend on sweepstakes sites, which pay no taxes and offer limited consumer protections.

Legalization would bring this activity under Arizona’s regulatory oversight, ensuring safer, regulated platforms for players.

States like New Jersey and Michigan demonstrate that legal online gambling can be highly lucrative and outpace sports betting by a wide margin.

The Arizona sports betting market, which generates over $7 billion in annual wagering handle and millions in monthly tax revenue, offers a glimpse into the economic benefits a regulated online casino market could provide.

Additionally, the ADG’s successful enforcement of identity verification, customer location, and responsible gambling measures demonstrates the state is well-equipped to regulate online casinos.

Although Arizona’s gambling stakeholders have yet to present a unified plan for legalizing online casinos, there are signs of growing interest.

Notably, some tribal gaming leaders have begun to warm to the idea of online gambling in Arizona. As gaming analyst Steve Ruddock noted on Substack, the CEO of Apache Gaming Enterprise remarked that he “wouldn’t be surprised if [online gambling is] coming very soon.”

Ruddock later noted that tribal attorneys at the Arizona Indian Gaming Association Expo explained that “while nothing is imminent, talks have begun.”

If a critical mass of tribal casino operators throws its weight behind online gambling, it could significantly accelerate legalization efforts.

Legalization Challenges

A significant challenge for legalization is the need to amend state law and potentially renegotiate tribal-state gaming compacts.

Arizona law prohibits all forms of gambling unless expressly authorized, meaning new legislation is required to permit online casinos. However, such legislation would likely necessitate renegotiating agreements with tribes, who currently hold exclusive rights to casino gaming.

To date, there has been little political momentum in the Arizona legislature to advance an online casino bill. Unlike sports betting, which garnered broad support from tribal casino operators and sports organizations, online gambling lacks a strong coalition committed to legalization.

Any proposed bill must address lawmakers’ concerns about the potential adverse effects of gambling expansion and its implications for tribal-state gaming compacts.

Tribal-state gaming compacts are a significant obstacle to legalizing Arizona online casinos.

Under these compacts, tribes have exclusivity over casino-style games like slots and table games in exchange for sharing revenue with the state.

Legalizing online casinos without tribal consent would violate these agreements and jeopardize the $120+ million in annual revenue-sharing payments the tribes make to the state.

Consequently, Arizona cannot simply copy a New Jersey-style commercial online gambling model; it must carefully navigate tribal interests.

Arizona demonstrated it is possible to strike a deal with the tribes when it legalized sports betting in return for new tribal concessions. For example, tribes gained the exclusive right to offer new types of Vegas-style games like craps, roulette, and baccarat.

However, Arizona’s tribes are not a monolithic group. Each has distinct interests, and smaller tribes may have different perspectives than larger gaming tribes.

Reaching an online gambling agreement that satisfies a majority (if not all) of Arizona’s tribal operators could be challenging.

Examining Arizona’s Online Gambling Stakeholders

Numerous stakeholders will shape the future of online gambling in Arizona.

Their engagement and ability to find common ground will determine whether Arizona moves forward and under what terms.

Tribal gaming operators are the most influential stakeholders in the Arizona online gambling debate.

Arizona’s tribal gaming operators arguably have the biggest stake in the outcome due to their current casino revenues and future online gambling potential.

They also have political leverage through their compacts and relationships with the state.

For tribal operators, online casinos represent both an opportunity and a threat.

On one hand, tribes can leverage online gambling to expand their customer base beyond their physical properties, generate additive revenue, and appeal to a younger demographic.

On the other hand, tribal operators are wary of cannibalization. If players stay at home to gamble online in Arizona, casino operators face risks such as:

  • Reduced foot traffic to land-based properties, affecting not only gaming revenue but ancillary income from hotel stays, restaurant visits, shopping, etc.
  • Losing location-based advantages – the risk of losing customers to competing casinos located in other parts of the state due to factors outside their control, like the quality of their online gambling operations/branding if partnered with third-party platform providers
  • Sovereignty concerns due to ceding control to outside corporations and negative unforeseen impacts caused by renegotiating their tribal-state gaming compacts

Despite these concerns, some tribal leaders are cautiously optimistic. As previously noted, at least one tribal casino executive has hinted that discussions are underway, suggesting that online gambling could arrive sooner than expected.

If tribal operators reach a consensus on a framework that mitigates their concerns, legalization could become achievable within a year. However, if they remain divided or largely opposed, online casinos will likely remain prohibited indefinitely.

Arizona’s state senators, representatives, and the governor will ultimately decide whether to pass a bill legalizing online casinos.

Wrangling together enough of these key officials, including the governor, to pass a bill will be no small task as their positions are influenced by:

  • Their constituents
  • Their personal views on gambling
  • Tribal input
  • Lobbying efforts
  • Their personal assessments of the political risks involved with backing or blocking an online gambling bill

Historically, Arizona’s political climate regarding gambling expansion has been moderate to conservative. The state’s gambling history spans voter approval of the Arizona Lottery in 1980, tribal casinos in the 1990s, and a significant gap until the legalization of online sports betting in 2021.

The successful launch of online sports betting in Arizona has likely eased some lawmakers’ reservations toward online gambling. They have witnessed that it can be implemented responsibly and rolled out quickly while generating significant tax revenue.

However, recent concerns have emerged that the Arizona online sports betting market isn’t meeting expectations.

Industry observers note that residents are saving less money as they bet more on sports, and the state is only receiving a small fraction of the money spent betting on sports.

Additionally, unlike some other states considering legalizing online casinos, Arizona lacks prominent lawmakers publicly advocating for legalization, and the state has not seriously considered any online casino bills.

The legislature’s stance will likely be influenced by input from tribal casino operators and public sentiment.

Online gambling brands (e.g., BetMGM Casino, Caesars Palace Online, FanDuel Casino, etc.) are generally strong legalization proponents because Arizona represents a lucrative new market.

Numerous commercial online gambling operators already have a foothold in the state via sports betting partnerships and would jump at the chance to offer online casino games in Arizona.

Although these companies lack the direct political influence they hold in states where they operate land-based casinos, they are likely working behind the scenes to build a case for legalization.

Instead, these companies must negotiate with the tribes to secure access to the Arizona online gambling market. However, sovereignty concerns and the tribes’ past experiences with commercial gaming partnerships may complicate negotiations.

Nonetheless, their interest is clear: commercial operators seek a regulated Arizona online gambling market with an open licensing framework that guarantees them a seat at the table.

As Arizona online gambling discussions progress, problem gambling advocacy groups are likely to urge caution or oppose legalization outright.

Some problem gambling groups have already noted concerning trends since Arizona legalized online sports betting.

For instance, the ADG Division of Problem Gambling has noted a steady increase in calls to its problem gambling helpline since Arizona legalized sports betting in 2021.

Similarly, a 2023 report published by the Division of Problem Gambling and Problem Gambling Solutions, Inc. highlighted that:

  • Before Arizona legalized sports betting, approximately 10% of residents who gambled had ever placed a sports wager online; that rate more than doubled to 21% after legalization
  • About one in three survey respondents who had attended a collegiate or professional sporting event within the past year had bet money on one or more Arizona teams

How Arizona May Regulate Online Casinos

Arizona does not have a bin of past online gambling bills to trawl for insight into how lawmakers may approach regulation.

However, regulatory frameworks from other states offer potential models for legislators to consider.

A key question is whether Arizona will pursue legalization via direct legislation or by amending tribal-state compacts.

The Legislative Approach

One option is for Arizona to replicate its sports betting model: passing legislation to issue online gambling licenses and updating its gaming compacts to include tribal participation.

Direct Tribal Negotiations

Alternatively, Arizona could follow the Florida online sports betting approach: negotiate directly with the tribes to grant them the exclusive right to offer online gambling.

This approach would authorize statewide gambling using a hub-and-spoke model. Servers would be located on tribal land, and wagers would be treated as occurring on tribal territory.

The Combination Approach

The likeliest scenario is a hybrid approach akin to the Connecticut online gambling model: the state and tribes negotiate a regulatory framework (such as who is eligible for licensing, revenue sharing terms, etc.) and then instruct the legislature to pass a bill implementing the agreement.

For example, the state and tribal operators may agree to:

  • Grant tribal operators the right to apply for online gambling licenses
  • Authorize tribal operators to partner with commercial online casino providers to operate at least one online gambling brand (“skin”) apiece
  • Limit or prohibit non-tribal licenses to conduct online gambling
  • Designate the Arizona Department of Gaming (ADG) as the regulatory authority over online gambling, or;
  • Designate a tribal authority to oversee online gambling while the ADG monitors for compliance with the renegotiated compacts

Tax and Revenue Sharing Considerations

Under any approach, Arizona and tribal operators would need to negotiate a tax or revenue-sharing agreement.

These discussions could grow complicated if the state and tribes revisit their land-based revenue-sharing agreements in the context of their sports betting negotiations.

Arizona may opt for a low-tax model, similar to its sports betting tax rates (8% retail, 10% online). The tribes will likely advocate for minimal revenue sharing.

However, concerns that sports betting has not generated as much tax revenue as anticipated may prompt the state to push for higher tax rates on Arizona online casinos.

Arizona Online Gambling Market Potential

The market potential for Arizona online casinos is significant, given the following:

  • The state’s population of approximately 7.6 million
  • An established gambling culture (lottery, casinos, sports betting)
  • Annual online gambling revenue in other states reaching $2.5 billion
  • The Arizona sports betting market generating over $7 billion in annual wagering handle

The most comparable states with legal online gambling are Michigan and New Jersey:

Michigan

  • Population: ~10 million
  • Annual iGaming Revenue (2024): ~$2.4 billion
  • Online gambling since 2021
  • Mixture of tribal and commercial casino operators

New Jersey

  • Population: ~9.5 million
  • Annual iGaming Revenue (2024): ~$2.4 billion
  • Online gambling since 2013
  • Established gambling culture

Adjusting for population differences, Arizona, with 75% of Michigan’s and 80% of Michigan’s population, could generate gross gaming revenue (GGR) of:

  • $1.8 billion in annual GGR (based on Michigan)
  • $1.9 billion in annual GGR (based on New Jersey)

These are rough estimates based solely on population comparisons that do not account for demographic differences, but they are plausible given Arizona’s strong sports betting performance.

A market forecast published by Vixio GamblingCompliance in 2024 offers more conservative projections:

  • Annual iGaming GGR: $1.237 billion
  • Annual tax revenue (17.5% tax rate): $216.5 million
  • Annual tax revenue (33% tax rate): $408.2 million

Arizona’s per capita income is near the national average, and it has a strong tourism and sports culture. Arizona quickly became a top-10 sports betting state when it legalized online sportsbooks.

If online gambling generates similar enthusiasm, revenue could trend toward the higher end of these estimates.

Conversely, if Arizona regulates online gambling in a way that limits tribal operators’ offerings or marketing capabilities, the market’s performance will trend toward the lower end of these forecasts.

Arizona Online Gambling FAQ

No. Arizona law permits sweepstakes casinos and online sports betting, but traditional online casinos remain prohibited.

Yes. However, sweepstakes casinos face increasing regulatory scrutiny, and future actions may restrict their operations in Arizona.

It varies by operator, but most sweepstakes casinos have minimum age policies of 18 or 21.

It’s too early to predict.

Although some tribal leaders suggest online gambling could arrive sooner than expected, the lack of legislative proposals, complex tribal negotiations, and problem gambling concerns point to a multi-year process.

The Arizona Department of Gaming (ADG) is the likeliest candidate due to its regulatory experience and proven track record overseeing online sports betting. However, tribal-state negotiations may result in a tribal agency sharing oversight responsibilities.