Historical Horse Racing Machines: How They Work

historical horse racing machines

Historical horse racing machines (HHRs) look and function much like slots from the user’s perspective, but they generate results using the outcomes of past horse races.

More importantly, historical horse racing gives players a slots-like experience in states where full-fledged slots aren’t legal. In short, it’s legal pari-mutuel horse racing betting with a slots-like patina.

How Historical Horse Racing Machines Work

Historical horse racing machines, also known as “instant racing,” are electronic gaming terminals that use past horse races to generate results.

Players feel like they’re playing slots, but technically, they’re betting on anonymized horse races that have already occurred (hence the term “historical”).

The terminal obscures the names and dates of the underlying races but provides a handicapping form so players can select three horses, just as they would at a live race.

However, most terminals offer a way for players to automate the selection process, so they end up playing a game that looks and feels just like a slot.

Only the last few seconds of the race are displayed on a small part of the screen. The rest of the monitor displays reels and symbols to show the player what, if anything, they won off the slot pull.

States With Historical Horse Racing Machines

Historical horse racing machines tend to appear in states that prohibit race tracks from offering slots.

Struggling race tracks nationwide have determined that historical horse racing terminals are among the best ways to compete with commercial, tribal, and out-of-state casinos for gamblers’ dollars.

A handful of states have formally legalized historical horse racing machines, while racing commissions in others have opted for the “do it now and apologize later” strategy. The latter approach rarely works and always leads to contentious debates.

Racing commissions in six states have authorized race tracks to install historical horse racing machines without legislative approval, but only Alabama has managed to keep its HHRs. In every other state that took this approach, the racing commission had to backtrack due to unfavorable attorney general opinions, lawsuits, or legislation.

Historical horse racing machines are available in seven states today:

Historical horse racing machines are available at three former greyhound tracks in Alabama:

  • Birmingham Race Course
  • VictoryLand Casino
  • Greene County Entertainment Center

Alabama has had better luck than every other state that has tried to authorize HHRs without waiting for legislative approval, especially for a state whose constitution bans nearly all forms of gambling.

Two unique factors work in Alabama’s favor on the HHR issue.

First, Alabama regulates pari-mutuel horse racing betting at the county level. Second, Alabama has an unusually amenable Attorney General.

Racing commissions in three counties have authorized HHRs, and the Attorney General’s office has confirmed that HHRs are legal in multiple communications.

Kansas legalized historical horse racing machines in 2022 through legislation that also authorized sports betting. The historical horse racing portion of the Kansas law allowed the defunct Wichita Greyhound Park, which closed in 2007, to install up to 1,000 historical horse racing machines.

In response, Wichita Greyhound Park owner Phil Ruffin announced plans to renovate and reopen the track sometime in 2023 or 2024. The Kansas Racing and Gaming Commission approved the plans, but a construction delay pushed the facility’s targeted launch date back to September 2025.

Horse racing is the most well-known form of gambling in Kentucky. The only other forms of legalized gambling in Kentucky are related to the state lottery and charitable games like bingo and raffles. Casinos and sports betting are not legal in the state. 

In 2010, race tracks lobbied the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission to approve historical racing machines. Later that year, regulators changed the definition of pari-mutuel wagering. The board asked a state court to sign off on this change, and it did. As a result, race tracks and off-track betting parlors receive the go-ahead to install historical horse racing machines.

A decade-long fight ensued between anti-gambling interests and the horseracing industry. Eventually, the issue reached the Kentucky Supreme Court, which ultimately found historical horse racing machines in violation of state laws that forbid the operation of slot machines.

However, the Kentucky Legislature codified instant racing in 2021 to permit the operation of the devices once again.

While the subject of historical racing worked its way through the courts, race tracks and off-track betting parlors wasted no time. Kentucky Downs launched the machines in 2011.

In 2012, historical racing opened at Ellis Park. Red Mile waited until 2015. Derby City Gaming, related to a simulcast facility, launched its first historical racing venue in 2018. A second opened in 2021. 

Turfway Park, just across the state line from Cincinnati, underwent a major renovation in 2021 to expand into the historical racing industry. The entire property was closed during this transition. 

Louisiana has 19 off-track betting parlors with up to 50 historical horse racing machines each. Many Louisiana OTBs also have video poker machines.

However, Louisiana may soon lose all of its HHRs. In early 2024, a Baton Rouge judge overturned the 2021 law because it constituted an illegal expansion of gambling.

The Louisiana Constitution requires a parish-by-parish referendum for any gambling expansion, but lawmakers passed the 2021 law without a referendum.

Louisiana may still legalize HHRs with voter approval, but the future of the state’s existing HHR facilities is uncertain. Some facilities have removed their HHRs, but others have left them in place while race track operators appeal the ruling.

Louisiana legalized historical horse racing via SB 209 in 2021, allowing race tracks not attached to casinos to offer historical horse racing machines.

Under state law, each property may host up to 50 historical horse racing machines. Parishes do not need to vote on historical racing if simulcast facilities are already legal. Parishes that have not yet approved off-track betting must hold a local referendum to approve historical racing businesses.

La. Admin. Code tit. 35 § XVII-13115 states that machines must pick each race randomly from a library of past results that include the date of the race, location, and finishing order.

Each race in the database has an equal opportunity to be picked. For example, the race that was just randomly chosen is just as likely to be picked as any other in the database for the next game.

After years of trying, New Hampshire became the sixth state to legalize historical racing. The machines are permitted at charitable casinos. Charities receive 35% of the gaming win from these devices and the other games offered at these venues, like blackjack and poker.

There are no live horse racing tracks in New Hampshire. The last live race in the state was held at Rockingham Park in 2009. However, off-track betting parlors and horse racing wagering apps are legal.

Virginia legalized historical racing machines in 2018 as part of a plan to reopen Colonial Downs, the state’s only horse racing track. The machines went live at Colonial Downs a year later.

Five off-track betting parlors under the Rosie’s Gaming Emporium brand offer these games. 

Like many other states, historical racing tried to find its way through the back door in Wyoming. It all started in 2003 when four simulcast betting facilities received approval from the Wyoming Pari-Mutuel Commission to install historical racing machines. 

The Wyoming Attorney General challenged the Commission’s decision and prevailed in 2005 when a trial court declared the devices illegal slot machines in violation of state law.

Off-track betting facilities removed their historical horse racing machines in response to the ruling, and the Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed the decision in 2006.

However, that wasn’t the end of historical horse racing in Wyoming. The state legislature legalized historical horse racing in 2013 under Wyo. Statutes § 11-25-102(a),(v)&(vii)(A),(B). The devices operate at more than a dozen simulcast betting venues in the state, often within taverns.

Is Historical Horse Racing Gambling?

Unsurprisingly, there’s significant debate regarding the legality of HHRs.

One of the main points of contention is whether HHRs meet the legal definition of “pari-mutuel betting.” Also known as totalizator or tote betting, pari-mutuel wagering is legal in most states.

Minor nuances in the underlying mechanics of a historical horse racing machine often determine whether the machine is legal.

For example, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled against a particular style of HHRs in 2020 because they didn’t pool customers’ wagers from identical horse races.

The machines in question showed three separate historical races to players, all incognito. The HHRs placed bets from multiple players into a shared pool, making them appear legal under Kentucky law.

However, the Kentucky Supreme Court decided that since players weren’t betting on the same races, the HHRs did not qualify as pari-mutuel wagering.

The Supreme Court put it this way in its decision:

“Without providing simultaneous access to one historical horse race to the same group of patrons, no pari-mutuel pool can be created among the patrons in which they are wagering among themselves, setting the odds and the payout.”

The evolution of instant racing machines also affected how anti-gambling activists and the courts perceive them. Early HHRs leaned heavily into the racing aspect, showing info from the racing form to the jockeys and the horses.

More recent iterations have largely abandoned the horse racing aesthetic in favor of a more “slots-heavy” approach, with spinning reels taking over and the actual horse racing videos getting less on-screen space.

Most historical horse racing machines even offer an auto-bet feature, eliminating the player’s need to pick a horse.

Modern HHRs resemble slots to such an extent that it’s hard to argue against opponents who say HHRs are just a way to exploit legal loopholes in states that prohibit slot gambling.

There’s no doubt these technological developments have stymied instant racing efforts in several states, and not without justification. After all, it’s not coincidental that slot machines are illegal or heavily regulated in states where race tracks have introduced historical horse racing machines.

Failed Attempts to Legalize HHR Machines

The racing industry and its regulators in multiple states have tried to lean on historical horse racing machines in the face of declining revenue and dwindling interest in live racing, but not all have succeeded.

The following states ran into hurdles in court or couldn’t get the state legislature on board and ultimately failed to keep historical horse racing machines at race tracks and simulcast racing locations.

Idaho race tracks and off-track betting parlors had a brief run with historical racing machines.

At the time, historical racing was only available at Les Bois Park, Greyhound Park, and the Double Down Bar & Grill. However, their availability opened the door for additional live and simulcast values to offer the games in the future.

2013: Idaho Legislature Approves Instant Racing

In 2013, the Idaho racing industry convinced lawmakers to approve a bill legalizing historical racing at any venue with live or simulcast racing.

Within a year, many lawmakers had buyer’s remorse. Several stated on record that they felt deceived about the definition of historical racing. According to some legislators, the thought process behind legalizing these machines was to allow mechanical horse racing machines like Sigma Derby and Fortune Cup that were more clearly related to past races.

When lawmakers saw what looked more like slot machines at Les Bois Park, Greyhound Park, and the Double Down Bar & Grill, they voiced their displeasure.

Lawmakers pointed out that tribal gaming interests had tried to buy Greyhound Park in the past in an attempt to offer slot machines. The governor refused to sign a gaming compact to authorize the purchase. A few years later, the state legislature banned the governor from allowing these forms of casinos. However, lawmakers noted that the same property the Coeur d’Alene Tribe tried to convert into a casino had essentially become one under racing interests.

In 2015, the state legislature repealed historical racing. Governor C.L. Otter vetoed the repeal, but the state supreme court determined the veto was invalid. As a result, three racing venues removed about 250 historical racing machines.

2018: Historical Racing Referendum Fails

Treasure Valley Racing, operators of the now-defunct Les Bois Park racing and simulcast facility, started a petition drive to get historical racing on the 2018 Idaho ballot. The Coeur d’Alene Tribe opposed the measure, but Treasure Valley succeeded in getting it put onto the November 2018 ballot as Proposition One.

However, Idaho voters defeated the proposition by a 54-46 margin. As a result, Les Bois Park ceased operations.

Greyhound Park is still active but no longer offers live racing. It is home to simulcast wagering and bingo games.

The Illinois Racing Board briefly attempted to legalize historical horse racing machines in 2018 to help struggling race tracks find new revenue sources amid increasing competition from other forms of gambling.

For example, the 2009 Video Gaming Act allowed licensed liquor retailers, truck stops and fraternal organization to host up to five video gaming terminals. After several years of delays, the first video gaming terminals in Illinois popped up in the second half of 2012. Since then, video gaming terminals have proliferated across the state. There are now more than 44,000 authorized video gaming terminals in Illinois.

Business was good for everyone but Illinois race tracks. The race tracks had fought for years to add slot machines to their premises to no avail. While other establishments benefitted from increased forms of legalized gambling, the state’s horse racing tracks were left out in the cold. Finally, the Illinois Racing Board decided to take matters into its own hands.

However, the issue became moot after Illinois passed a sweeping gambling expansion law in 2019. The law authorized race tracks to offer sports betting in Illinois, slot machines, and table games, all of which granted the local racing industry a much-needed reprieve from declining revenue.

Minnesota horse race tracks briefly received permission to offer historical horse racing but lost the opportunity before they could install a single machine.

In April 2024, the Minnesota Racing Commission voted in favor of allowing Canterbury Park and Running Aces to install historical horse racing machines despite tribal casino operators’ protests. Minnesota’s race tracks say permission to offer historical horse racing is a matter of survival amid declining revenues, falling purses, and competition with tribal casinos for gambling dollars.

However, the Minnesota legislature passed a bill to ban historical horse racing less than two months later.

Lawmakers and regulators tried to boost the struggling Nebraska horse racing industry on three separate occasions by authorizing HHRs at racetracks but ran into insurmountable obstacles in every instance.

Voters came to the rescue in 2020 when they approved a constitutional amendment authorizing casino gambling at Nebraska racetracks. The amendment delivered the financial relief Nebraska racetracks needed and rendered the historical horse racing debate moot.

The Texas Racing Commission approved historical racing machines at race tracks with off-track betting parlors in 2014 to save the local horse racing industry. Later that year, a judge struck down the regulations due to a conflict with the Texas Constitution, which does not permit this type of gambling. 

The Texas Racing Commission appealed the decision after the attorney general declined to represent the Commission. However, the Commission dropped the lawsuit in response to threats from state legislators to withhold state funding to the Commission.

The Texas horse racing industry claimed at the time that it needed instant racing to survive as it lost business to casinos in Louisiana, New Mexico, and Oklahoma. Texas horse racing is almost extinct today.

A Brief History of “Instant Racing”

Eric Jackson, a General Manager desperately trying to save his failing Oaklawn Park race track in Arkansas, conceived the instant racing concept in the 1990s.

The first deployment of instant racing machines at Oaklawn Park in 2000 was successful, but it requires some help from the General Assembly to remove some legal restrictions related to simulcast racing.

Race tracks in other states soon followed suit after gaining approval from the relevant state authorities. But in Oregon and Wyoming, HHR machines were met with opposition from the State Attorney Generals, who questioned their status as pari-mutuel betting systems.

In 2006, the Wyoming Supreme Court characterized HHRs as a “slot machine that attempts to mimic traditional pari-mutuel wagering.” It would take another decade and explicit legalization efforts from the Wyoming legislature before HHR machines were allowed at race tracks and betting parlors.

Numerous other states have attempted to legalize and introduce instant racing machines. These attempts were dashed by Governors, Attorneys General, or courts questioning their legality.

Historical Horse Racing FAQ

Alabama, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, New Hampshire, Virginia, and Wyoming have historical horse racing machines.

No. The symbols on historical horse racing terminals are for entertainment purposes only. Every result from historical horse racing games is determined by the outcome of a real race that occurred in the past.

Yes. Most historical horse racing machines provide a small video of the last few seconds of the race upon which that round is based and provide an option for players to view the entire race.

Historical horse racing machines provide handicapping data so players can make intelligent picks. However, some players use auto-selection features to create a more slot-like experience.

Some machines show each horse’s pre-race odds before each spin of the reels, but some devices only show other handicapping data like recent results.

Most historical horse racing machines look and feel like slots, but they are never identical to slots. Most importantly, historical horse racing machines based their results on real past races, whereas slots use random number generators to generate truly random results.

In addition, historical horse racing machines allow bettors to select specific horses and view handicapping information. They also allow players to watch videos of the underlying races after making their selections.

Similar Posts